Cold War 2023

Stove Top #7: Huawei is our enemy, Big Brother France, true crime is for sickos.

Welcome back to the Stove Top weekly newsletter. As usual, each edition has a few brief stories and finishes with a mix of interesting links, hot takes, and good reads.

Enjoy

Tech

For those who don’t know, Huawei is a Chinese telecommunications company. They are one of the largest smartphone manufacturers in the world, and specifically, one of the leading providers of 5G mobile technology. This 5G technology should make them absolutely dominant, but accusations of Chinese state espionage in the West has steadily dogged them throughout the years.

And it appears to be pretty clear that Huawei is a piece of Chinese spyware. The evidence against them makes even TikTok look clean:

  • 25,000 Huawei employees have Chinese intelligence backgrounds.

  • They are basically government-owned and are so important in China that blocking Huawei is an act of aggression.

  • They assisted in the surveillance and mass detention of Uyghurs and tested a facial-recognition AI that could spy on people better for the Chinese government.

  • And they assisted in building Chinese spy sites on Cuba.

Naturally, Huawei claims innocence on these charges. But the West is increasingly taking action against the 5G provider:

Bigger picture, it feels like the US and China are on a crash course for a technology trade war. They are probably already in one right now. Biden attacks Chinese semiconductors. China bans Micron chips. The US is considering a ban on investing in Chinese tech. Apple is moving its supply chain away from China. Microsoft is taking its top Chinese AI experts out of China. TikTok and Huawei are under constant scrutiny. Sequoia sawed off its Chinese branch.

It’s the cold war all over again.

Politics

I’ve previously written about the EU’s distaste for encryption, but France takes it to another level. Not only are they arresting people for using encryption services like Signal and WhatsApp, but they are claiming that the very use of these services implies terroristic activities. In other words, in France, if you want some privacy, you are seen as a terrorist.

That’s the slippiest of slippery slopes. In one fell swoop, France has made everything from private messages to VPNs basically illegal. It’s a cypherpunk’s worst nightmare.

What is so interesting and scary is that this isn’t a story from China, Russia, or North Korea. This is France. A Western “free” country. If it could happen there, why couldn’t it happen anywhere?

The answer is it could, and it probably will. The only thing preventing a dystopian 1984 surveillance state in the West are cultural norms. But this is eroding. Governments are now starting to equate privacy with danger. The citizenry is now doing the same if they care about surveillance at all, as most of them are numbed from the constant Big Tech spying.

Politics flows downstream from culture. That’s all politics is: cultural norms codified. If the culture becomes “only criminals care about privacy”, then it’s only a matter of time until privacy is outlawed. Couple those politics with the overwhelming power of the modern state to surveil, and you now have 1984.

This is what annoys me so much about people in the West who say that cryptocurrencies have no use case. They argue that because we have money and an economy that works, we don’t need crypto. But they miss the point that just because you don’t need something right this instance doesn’t miss you’ll never need it in the future. It is very possible to envision a world where crypto is the only money free from government surveillance and intrusion in existence. And even if you don’t agree, you can just not use crypto and go on with your life exactly as it was before. It makes no sense why non-government agents would go out of their way to criticize and work against it.

But, as usual, people won’t appreciate something until it’s gone.

Culture

I watched the newest season of Black Mirror this week, just like every other tech nerd. Honestly, I wasn’t that impressed. The first two episodes were just ok-good, the third episode was ok, and the last two episodes sucked.

However, the second episode did get me thinking about something that I’ve wondered about before. For those who haven’t seen it, the second episode has to do with an old crime in a sleepy Scottish town that is turned into a documentary. In the process of making this documentary, basically everything that could go wrong for the main character goes wrong. The result is he has a very successful documentary, but every other aspect of his life freaking sucks.

Obviously, it’s a commentary on true crime.

I got my start in true crime from an ex-girlfriend who was absolutely obsessed with it. I didn’t understand why. Who wants to watch or listen to the details of a murder? Turns out, a lot of people do:

  • 34% of podcast listeners regularly listen to true crime podcasts.

  • 24% of the top podcasts are about true crime, the most common topic among top podcasts.

  • There are more popular true crime documentaries than I can count.

Is this a good thing for individual people and society at large? I’m not really sure. Like most things, it’s a complex question.

On the one hand, there’s no evidence that true crime romanticizes crime to the point that people want to become criminals. People have been consuming true crime forever now. OJ’s case was true crime. So was Bonnie and Clyde. Even with all this violent content, not to mention video games, crime has been down-only for decades now.

On the other hand, there is evidence that true crime is negative for mental health. Makes sense, because most people who watch true crime are women, who also happen to be the demographic most afraid of getting minked in a dark alley. Consuming hours of true crime isn’t going to ease these fears. I see this in my own life. I know tons of girls (and guys) who won’t sleep without their doors and windows locked. Even though we live in a wealthy neighborhood.

On the other other hand, there is something supremely fucked up about making money off people who were murdered. This is what Black Mirror points out. You have to be a special type of sick to see a grisly murder and think to yourself “this could be a great documentary”. Of course, this is what the families of victims have been saying for years.

So yeah, it’s just entertainment, people can make whatever they want, and it doesn’t hurt viewers beyond making them think twice about walking in the dark. But, how would you feel if you had to re-live a loved one’s murder over and over?

I wouldn’t feel too good.

Extras

Until next time, ✌️

Hit me up on Twitter!

Reply

or to participate.